John White Alexander, Repose (1895)

John White Alexander, Repose (1895)

I received my Ph.D. in English from Harvard University in November 2023. My dissertation won the Le Baron Russell Briggs Prize for the best dissertation in 20th-century British and Anglophone literature at Harvard.

My research focuses on 19th and 20th century British literature, aesthetics, and intersections between literature and political economy. I try to use literature as a window into parts of life (e.g. aesthetic and affective experience) that are difficult to study through other disciplines. I have also worked collaboratively with colleagues in History of Science on the topic of disinformation.

I hold an M.Sc. in History of Science, Medicine, and Technology from Oxford, where I studied on a Rhodes scholarship. I earned my B.A. in Political & Social Thought from the University of Virginia.

The Art of Idleness

The Art of Idleness: The Questioning of Work in Modern Literature (under contract with Harvard University Press) seeks to rethink the relationship between literature and the world of work by renewing attention to the problem of “idleness,” the stylized withdrawal from labor—a stance that many important writers in the modern era have found salient or even embraced. From the late nineteenth century forward, literature increasingly takes up the task of questioning work, valorizing idleness, and imagining forms of life detached from, or resistant to, the demands of productivity. This rehabilitation of idleness occurs not just in, say, the decadent and aestheticist writings of the 1890s, where we might expect to find it, but more widely, across a range of important literary movements, and often in texts that aspire toward ambitious or comprehensive visions of modernity. From Émile Zola’s novels of naturalism to the modernism of the Harlem Renaissance and the Bloomsbury Group to the homoerotic aestheticism of Alan Hollinghurst, a sensuous embrace of idleness and beauty supports a political critique of the centrality of labor. These texts imagine—and enact via aesthetic form—how “free time” might be distributed more democratically across the population.

Literature asks us to think and dream, sometimes for hours on end. The tension between this lavishly time-intensive art form and the speed and pressure of modern economies is often noted. Less often examined is how writers have responded to that tension by linking idleness with metaphysical and aesthetic goods. The Art of Idleness traces an alliance between leisure and literary form, arguing that literature serves as an essential bulwark against the dominance of labor in modern life.

SCHOLARLY PUBLICATIONS

Articles

“The Intelligence of Artifice: Oscar Wilde and AI,” with Michèle Mendelssohn, Textual Practice (13 Feb 2025): 123-144.

“Cynthia Ozick’s ‘Outcry of Failure’,” Studies in American Jewish Literature (Spring 2024): 109-125.

“Cynthia Ozick and the Art of Nonfiction,” with Michèle Mendelssohn, Studies in American Jewish Literature (Spring 2024): 1-11. Editors’ introduction to special issue on Ozick’s literary essays.

“The Allure of Idleness in Zola’s Rougon-Macquart,” Dibur (Fall 2023): 11-27.

“Trends in American Scientists' Political Donations and Implications for Trust in Science,” with Sasha Kaurov, Viktoria Cologna, and Naomi Oreskes (second author), Humanities and Social Sciences Communications (2022).

“Bored Housewives,” Post45 Contemporaries (2022). Appearance on Post45 podcast and International Society of Boredom Studies podcast.

“The American University, the Politics of Professors, and the Narrative of ‘Liberal Bias,’” with Naomi Oreskes. Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 9:8 (2020): 14-32. Reprinted in The Social Production of Knowledge in a Neoliberal Age: Debating the Challenges Facing Higher Education, ed. Justin Cruikshank (New York: Rowman & Littlefield, 2022).

“Hardy’s Aesthetics of Groups: Cell, Choir, Crowd.” The Thomas Hardy Journal 35 (Autumn 2019): 98-110.

“Technology.” Victorian Literature and Culture 46:3-4 (Fall/Winter 2018): 900-905.

“‘A Being Apart’: Sympathy and Distance in Middlemarch.” George Eliot Review 48 (2017): 7-15. (Winner of 2017 George Eliot Fellowship Essay Prize)

“Moral Caesuras” (reply to V21 special issue of boundary2 online). V21: Victorian Studies for the Twenty-First Century (2017).

Book Chapters

“Queer or Describe? Alan Hollinghurst and the Bloomsbury Group.” Contemporary Queer Modernism, ed. Melanie Micir (Routledge, 2025), 313-327.

“How American Businessmen Made Us Believe that Free Enterprise was Indivisible from American Democracy: The National Association of Manufacturers’ Propaganda Campaign 1935-1940,” with Naomi Oreskes and Erik M. Conway. In The Disinformation Age: Politics, Technology, and Disruptive Communication in the United States, eds. Lance Bennett and Steven Livingston (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2020), 95-119. PDF.

Reviews

Review-essay on Daniel Wright, Bad Logic: Reasoning About Desire in the Victorian Novel (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP, 2018). Poetics Today 41:1 (2020), 151-158. Special issue on logic and literary form.

Review of Eric Dietrich, Excellent Beauty: The Naturalness of Religion and the Unnaturalness of the World (New York: Columbia UP, 2015) and Roger Wagner and Andrew Briggs, The Penultimate Curiosity: How Science Swims in the Slipstream of Ultimate Questions (Oxford: Oxford UP, 2016). British Journal for the History of Science 50:1 (March 2017): 160-2.